This study was conducted in the traditional pastoralist communities of Dolo Ado and Bokolmayo districts in the Somali Region of Ethiopia. These are refugee-hosting communities where the World Food Programme (WFP) is providing humanitarian and livelihood support. This research was designed in partnership with WFP with the expectation that its findings may provide lessons that can inform the organization’s program activities benefiting refugee-hosting communities and integrated refugees. Our study examines livelihood and collective action practices in these communities in the context of climate and waterrelated stresses. It seeks to highlight factors and practices that can enhance drought-resilient livelihoods. This aspect of the study required an understanding of traditional, but changing, livelihood strategies and related institutional and sociocultural practices. In this report, we discuss a range of interrelated topics and their implications for livelihood sustainability and linked interventions—which we highlight in the section Conclusions and Suggestions. We envisage that these findings will be useful for WFP’s program agenda of integrating its emergency-humanitarian response with livelihood resilience building through long-term structural and multidimensional food security approaches. Analysis of the historical and social context of farming and collective practices in these communities revealed that crop production and pastoralism have long co-existed as means of livelihood. While cooperative farming has recently expanded in the two study areas, their past experience of collective labor practices did provide the social and cultural foundation for current cooperative action. Local users appreciate irrigation farming conducted through cooperatives for its valuable contribution to food and income security. However, irrigation farming in the study areas operates in terms of cooperatives rather than on the basis of irrigation water users’ associations (IWUAs), which possibly affects the prospect of legal recognition and sustained practice. Understanding such issues is important for improving the practices of current WFP-supported irrigation cooperatives for the benefit of both refugee-hosting communities and hosted refugees. The livelihoods of people in the study areas have historically and traditionally been associated with pastoralism, characterized by livestock herding and mobility. However, there has been a shift from pastoralism toward sedentary farming. This change is being shaped by climatic and political economy factors and processes, thereby giving it the character of an adaptive livelihood strategy. The shift of livelihoods toward farming and crop production involves gender dynamics. It opens new areas of responsibility for women and increases their workload while having implications for gender disparities in economic gain and financial decision-making power. Therefore, it is imperative that cooperative farming and other intervention pr

This report introduces the refined Multidimensional Digital Inclusiveness Index (MDII), developed to assess and promote inclusiveness in digital innovations within agricultural systems. Developed through iterative consultation with experts and stakeholders, the MDII integrates structural and experiential dimensions of digital inclusiveness. It distinguishes between inclusion — ensuring access and usability — and inclusivity — fostering a sense of belonging and meaningful engagement among diverse underserved groups. By applying theoretical frameworks such as the Capability Approach and the Technology Acceptance Model, the MDII captures the multifaceted nature of digital inclusiveness, addressing both tangible and psychological aspects. The revised framework (Version 3.0) evaluates inclusiveness across seven core dimensions, including accessibility, stakeholder relationships, and the social impacts of digital innovations. Significant refinements have been made to reduce complexity, eliminate redundancies, and introduce actionable core and extended indicators. Piloted across multiple regions, the MDII demonstrates adaptability and effectiveness in assessing inclusiveness within varying socio-economic and cultural contexts. The report highlights the importance of user-centric design and culturally responsive approaches to ensure digital tools are accessible, equitable, and relevant. By addressing critical challenges such as digital illiteracy, device affordability, and socio- cultural constraints, the MDII aims to empower underserved communities and foster resilience within agricultural systems. This refined framework provides actionable insights for policymakers, innovators, and development organizations, supporting the creation of inclusive digital ecosystems that bridge the digital divide. Future steps involve expanding the MDII’s application through multi-country pilots, incorporating empirical feedback to refine the framework further, and developing user-friendly tools to enable real-time evaluation and deliver impactful recommendations.

While digital tools and services present an opportunity to address some of the critical challenges facing food and water systems, concerns remain over large groups of people, such as women, elderly people, or people with little formal education, who may be excluded from the development, use, and benefit of digital innovation. In this report we present the outcome of a study that was conducted to assess whether a digital innovation that provides an irrigation service in many African countries was socially inclusive. The assessment was done with the multi-dimensional digital inclusivity index, a tool that is being developed for assessing digital inclusiveness across various dimensions in food, land, and water systems.

Bangladesh, one of the worldapos;s most densely populated countries, faces significant challenges related to poverty, food insecurity, and agricultural productivity. With over 40% of the population engaged in agriculture, the majority of which involves smallholder rice farming, these challenges are even more pronounced. Approximately 92% of farmers own less than 0.5 hectares of land, making it difficult for them to achieve sustainable incomes. While efforts like irrigation and triple-cropping aim to intensify crop production, they often fail to ensure economic stability, especially in climate-vulnerable coastal regions. Farmers in these areas frequently resort to seasonal migration and face severe economic distress. Given these conditions, agricultural innovation and access to extension services are crucial for improving food security and farmer livelihoods. However, adoption of new agricultural practices remains low, especially among women, due to challenges such as low literacy, cultural norms, and limited social mobility. Agricultural extension services are vital to addressing these challenges. Traditionally provided by public institutions, these services are increasingly supplemented by private and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), driven by declining government funding. Public extension services focus on providing subsidized inputs, such as seeds and fertilizers. However, inefficiencies arise due to poor coordination between stakeholders, leading to contradictory advice and resource misallocation. Furthermore, outreach is often insufficient, particularly for marginalized groups like women and landless farmers, who are frequently excluded from formal training programs. Cultural practices, such as purdah, further limit women’s participation in public activities, restricting their access to agricultural knowledge. While informal networks, including farmer-led clubs and local NGOs, play an important role in disseminating information, they lack the capacity to drive large-scale, sustainable change. A study conducted in Polder 34/2 of Batiaghata Upazila, Khulna District, highlights the limitations of formal extension services. The research found that most farmers rely on informal knowledge-sharing networks or peer observation, as formal training mainly benefits landowning farmers. Those who received formal extension services reported better crop yields, whereas those relying on informal networks struggled with climate-related issues, such as salinity and irregular rainfall. The study also revealed that extension services predominantly focus on crop systems, neglecting the important roles of livestock and fisheries, which are also vital to the agrarian economy. This lack of integration across agricultural sectors further exacerbates the vulnerabilities faced by smallholder farmers. In conclusion, while agricultural extension services have the potential to improve food security and support smallholder farmers, the current system is fragmented a