Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice
The Resource Recovery and Reuse publication series and its publisher, the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) acknowledge the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) recommended Code of Conduct. Please refer to our statement on Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice.Â
Displaying 25 publications
Report
Global South / Developing countries / Indicators / Awareness-raising / Competitive behaviour / Markets / Entrepreneurs / Biogas / Renewable energy / Composting / Organic fertilizers / Sustainable Development Goals / Waste management / Public institutions / Private sector / Contracts / Legislation / Taxes / Lending / Funding / Financial inclusion / Access to finance / Corruption / Incentives / Infrastructure / Governance / Business models / Guidelines / Policies / Frameworks / Regulations / Investment / Bioeconomy / Circular economy / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H053062
Assessing the investment climate to promote a circular bioeconomy: a comparison of 15 countries in the Global South
Transitioning towards a circular economy requires investments in new businesses and for this, a supportive environment and business models that can attract private entities are needed. Operating in countries where the enabling factors are minimal or weak proves extremely challenging for private enterprises. The present cross-country study tried to assess the investment climate for promoting a circular bioeconomy, i.e., businesses or public-private partnerships based on organic (municipal) waste. The main indicators used for the assessment are existing regulatory frameworks; business climate and associated procedures; governance in provision of infrastructure; incentives; access to finance; and entrepreneurial ecosystems. While most of the countries analyzed indicated evidence of regulations on waste management and policies related to promoting circularity, the divide is mainly on aspects related to business environments, access to finance and governance. The World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business index and Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) indicate that Southeast Asian and Latin American countries are better positioned than most other Asian and African countries. National economies are challenged by these barriers that need to be addressed to foster the widespread adoption of a more circular bioeconomy.
Global South / Developing countries / Indicators / Awareness-raising / Competitive behaviour / Markets / Entrepreneurs / Biogas / Renewable energy / Composting / Organic fertilizers / Sustainable Development Goals / Waste management / Public institutions / Private sector / Contracts / Legislation / Taxes / Lending / Funding / Financial inclusion / Access to finance / Corruption / Incentives / Infrastructure / Governance / Business models / Guidelines / Policies / Frameworks / Regulations / Investment / Bioeconomy / Circular economy / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H053062
Report
Case studies / Soil composition / Environmental health / Public health / Value chains / Profitability / Costs / Market demand / Frameworks / Regulations / Policies / Municipal authorities / Public-private partnerships / Electricity generation / Biogas / Pellets / Composting / Sludge disposal / Solid wastes / Biochar / Pyrolysis / Gasification / Incineration / Anaerobic digestion / Sludge dewatering / Technology / Sewage treatment / Landfills / Waste management / Wastewater treatment plants / Phosphorus / Biosolids / Organic fertilizers / Energy recovery / Nutrients / Circular economy / Business models / Sewage sludge / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H052417
Sewage sludge: a review of business models for resource recovery and reuse
In many low- and middle-income countries, sewage sludge generated from wastewater treatment systems has potential environmental and health hazards. To tackle this challenge, there is a need for innovative options given the increasing concerns and policies restricting sewage sludge dumping in landfills and elsewhere, and a growing awareness about the resource value of sludge within a circular economy. In developed countries, water utilities, municipalities and the private sector are increasingly engaged in utilizing and innovating modern resource recovery technologies to capture biosolids, nutrients or energy from sewage sludge and reducing disposal.; This study reviews existing approaches and business models for resource recovery and moves the discussion beyond technical feasibility. Case studies were analyzed in support of four main sets of business models depending on the targeted resource: (i) organic fertilizers, (ii) crop nutrients, (iii) energy, and (iv) organic fertilizers and nutrients along with energy. The extraction of organic fertilizers through dewatering, thickening, stabilization or long-term storage drives the first set of models followed by technological advances in phosphorus recovery. The business models on energy similarly start from conventional energy recovery processes (anaerobic digestion) and move toward incineration. The discussion covers recent advances in gasification and pyrolysis. Transforming sewage sludge into biochar, for example, can support soil fertility and carbon sequestration. The final set covers integrative approaches supporting soil fertility and energy needs.; The critical step for emerging economies is to develop a wastewater management strategy and link it to a circular economy framework without having a negative impact on environmental and human health. While technologies and business models generally have a favorable policy environment, there is a lack of a regulatory framework that allows the marketing, use and export of recovered (waste-derived) resources for certain applications. For example, there needs to be an increase in industry acceptance of phosphorus recovered from sewage sludge to penetrate agricultural markets despite the currently still cheaper phosphate rock, which is a finite resource.
Case studies / Soil composition / Environmental health / Public health / Value chains / Profitability / Costs / Market demand / Frameworks / Regulations / Policies / Municipal authorities / Public-private partnerships / Electricity generation / Biogas / Pellets / Composting / Sludge disposal / Solid wastes / Biochar / Pyrolysis / Gasification / Incineration / Anaerobic digestion / Sludge dewatering / Technology / Sewage treatment / Landfills / Waste management / Wastewater treatment plants / Phosphorus / Biosolids / Organic fertilizers / Energy recovery / Nutrients / Circular economy / Business models / Sewage sludge / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H052417
Report
Awareness / Communities / Soil quality / Faecal sludge / Agricultural wastes / Climate change mitigation / Carbon credits / Sustainability / Contracts / Procurement planning / Municipal authorities / Stakeholders / Small and medium enterprises / Marketing / Investment / Infrastructure / Social analysis / Environmental assessment / Costs / Project design / Feasibility studies / Economic viability / Legal frameworks / Regulations / Policies / Risk management / Financial analysis / Innovation / Appropriate technology / Scaling up / Markets / Business models / Briquettes / Biogas / Bioenergy / Organic fertilizers / Organic wastes / Composting / Recycling / Solid wastes / Waste management / Case studies / Developing countries / Public-private partnerships / Bioeconomy / Circular economy / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H052155
Public-private partnerships for the circular bio-economy in the Global South: lessons learned
Processing biomass from different waste streams into marketable products such as organic fertilizer and bio-energy is increasingly realized through public-private partnerships (PPPs). In developing countries, the private sector can be expected to contribute technical skills, organizational capabilities and marketing expertise, and leverage capital inflow. In contrast, the public sector will provide the regulatory framework and help its enforcement, plan public investment, involve and educate stakeholders, and ensure waste supply.
This report reviews case studies that implemented PPPs in resource recovery and reuse (RRR) from waste streams with a particular focus on Asia and Africa, including those PPPs facilitated by the authors. Critical factors behind the success and failure of these cases are analyzed. The review indicates three key barriers to success: (i) waste-related bottlenecks, (ii) limited awareness about RRR products and their market(ing), and (iii) lack of proper institutional frameworks. Common shortfalls concern failure to meet commitments related to the quality and quantity of waste, missing understanding of the reuse market, etc. The report points out mitigation measures addressing possible challenges around appropriate technologies, finance and revenue streams, legal issues, as well as social and environmental concerns. It is required to establish close monitoring, appropriate procurement mechanisms and due diligence during the project preparation and pre-bid. If possible, such a PPP project should consider risk and commercial viability assessment as well as financial strategy planning (scaling).
Successful involvement of the private sector in the RRR market is critical to close the resource loop and safeguard human and environmental health, which is the overarching objective of sustainable waste management.
Awareness / Communities / Soil quality / Faecal sludge / Agricultural wastes / Climate change mitigation / Carbon credits / Sustainability / Contracts / Procurement planning / Municipal authorities / Stakeholders / Small and medium enterprises / Marketing / Investment / Infrastructure / Social analysis / Environmental assessment / Costs / Project design / Feasibility studies / Economic viability / Legal frameworks / Regulations / Policies / Risk management / Financial analysis / Innovation / Appropriate technology / Scaling up / Markets / Business models / Briquettes / Biogas / Bioenergy / Organic fertilizers / Organic wastes / Composting / Recycling / Solid wastes / Waste management / Case studies / Developing countries / Public-private partnerships / Bioeconomy / Circular economy / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H052155
Report
Farmers / Entrepreneurs / Social marketing / Community involvement / Sanitation / Health hazards / Sustainable Development Goals / Wastewater irrigation / Composting / Organic wastes / Wastewater treatment / Recycling / Waste collection / Faecal sludge / Household wastes / Urban wastes / s participation / Womenapos / Business models / Circular economy / Agricultural value chains / Liquid wastes / Solid wastes / Waste management / Social equality / Gender equity / Water reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H050720
Gender dimensions of solid and liquid waste management for reuse in agriculture in Asia and Africa
This report examines social equality aspects related to resource recovery through solid waste composting and wastewater irrigation. The report shows that women are represented in greatest numbers at the base of the recycling chain, most often as informal waste pickers and as sorters of recyclables with limited access to resources and upward mobility. Despite a wide gender gap in the solid waste and sanitation sectors, women play a key role in both municipal waste reduction and food safety where irrigation water is unsafe. Analyzing the gender dimension is important for understanding household responses to recycling programs, differences between the formal and informal sectors as well as along the waste-to-resource value chain from collection to treatment and reuse. The report stresses the important role of women in household waste management, including waste segregation, and the power of women-dominated waste picker associations, where the informal sector plays an essential role alongside the formal sector.
Farmers / Entrepreneurs / Social marketing / Community involvement / Sanitation / Health hazards / Sustainable Development Goals / Wastewater irrigation / Composting / Organic wastes / Wastewater treatment / Recycling / Waste collection / Faecal sludge / Household wastes / Urban wastes / s participation / Womenapos / Business models / Circular economy / Agricultural value chains / Liquid wastes / Solid wastes / Waste management / Social equality / Gender equity / Water reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H050720
Report
Case studies / Environmental impact / Socioeconomic impact / Risk assessment / Public health / Water quality / Food safety / Nutrients / Fish feeding / Cost recovery / Circular economy / Financial analysis / Fisheries value chains / Markets / Nongovernmental organizations / Public-private partnerships / Stabilization ponds / Treatment plants / Infrastructure / Integrated systems / Fishery production / Wastewater treatment / Developing countries / Sustainability / Business models / Wastewater aquaculture / Water reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H050557
Safe and sustainable business models for water reuse in aquaculture in developing countries
Wastewater-fed aquaculture has a long history, especially in Asia. This report examines three empirical cases of integrated wastewater treatment and aquaculture production. From an aquaculture entrepreneur’s perspective, the combination of fish farming and wastewater treatment in common waste stabilization ponds allows significant savings on capital (pond infrastructure) and running costs (wastewater supporting fish feed). On the other hand, the treatment plant owner will have the benefit of a partner taking over plant maintenance. Given the importance of food safety and related perceptions, the report is focusing on innovative business models where the marketed fish is not in direct contact with the treated wastewater, but only the brood stock or fish feed. The financial analysis of the presented systems shows profitable options for the fish farmer, operational and in part capital cost recovery for the treatment plant, and as the treatment plant operators can stop charging households a sanitation fee, eventually a triple-win situation for both partners and the served community.
Case studies / Environmental impact / Socioeconomic impact / Risk assessment / Public health / Water quality / Food safety / Nutrients / Fish feeding / Cost recovery / Circular economy / Financial analysis / Fisheries value chains / Markets / Nongovernmental organizations / Public-private partnerships / Stabilization ponds / Treatment plants / Infrastructure / Integrated systems / Fishery production / Wastewater treatment / Developing countries / Sustainability / Business models / Wastewater aquaculture / Water reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H050557
Report
Costs / Consumer participation / Awareness raising / Policies / Regulations / Feeds / Composting / Food preservation / Environmental impact / Goal 12 Responsible production and consumption / Sustainable Development Goals / Nutrients / Energy recovery / Incentives / Markets / Public-private partnerships / Entrepreneurs / Stakeholders / Food supply chains / Waste collection / Food losses / Food consumption / Recycling / Redistribution / Waste reduction / Urban wastes / Waste management / Business models / Food wastes / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H050448
Business models for urban food waste prevention, redistribution, recovery and recycling
A necessary extension of the concept of Resource Recovery and Reuse with an even higher priority is the prevention and reduction of waste. One concern, in particular, is food waste, which constitutes the largest share of human waste. Target 12.3 of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is to ‘halve per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer levels and reduce food losses along production and supply chains, including post-harvest losses, by 2030’. For this report, over 400 businesses were analyzed to identify common approaches and business models to address the food waste challenge. The business models are presented under seven categories – measurement, redistribution, resell, value addition, responsible waste collection, resource recovery, and recycling – with a special focus on their application potential to the Global South.
Costs / Consumer participation / Awareness raising / Policies / Regulations / Feeds / Composting / Food preservation / Environmental impact / Goal 12 Responsible production and consumption / Sustainable Development Goals / Nutrients / Energy recovery / Incentives / Markets / Public-private partnerships / Entrepreneurs / Stakeholders / Food supply chains / Waste collection / Food losses / Food consumption / Recycling / Redistribution / Waste reduction / Urban wastes / Waste management / Business models / Food wastes / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H050448
Report
Case studies / Households / Composting / Biogas / Nutrients / Energy recovery / Taxes / Government procurement / Technology / Risk / Profitability / Benefits / Cost recovery / Operating costs / Investment / Pricing / Marketing / Funding / Financial viability / Nongovernmental organizations / Stakeholders / Public-private partnerships / Urban areas / Treatment plants / Transport / Waste disposal / Toilets / Septic tanks / Solid wastes / Sustainable Development Goals / Hygiene / Sanitation / Desludging / Waste treatment / Value chains / Business models / Waste management / Faecal sludge / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H050010
Business models for fecal sludge management in India
Globally, 50% of the population relies on on-site sanitation systems (OSS) such as septic tanks and pit latrines and is, hence, in need of Fecal Sludge Management (FSM) solutions. India is a classic example, given that its government built more than 100 million toilets with the majority relying on OSS. With 400 fecal sludge treatment plants (FSTPs) in various stages of planning, procurement and construction, this report comes at an opportune time to present findings on FSM business models already implemented across India.
Interviews were conducted with a total of 105 Emptying and Transport (Eamp;T) operators in 72 towns and cities across 16 states in India, 22 representatives from municipalities that own emptying vehicles, 18 FSTP operators and more than 30 institutions. In addition, procurement tenders for Eamp;T and FSTPs in 13 states were analyzed.
In total, 18 business models were identified, several with energy or nutrient recovery components. The analysis of Eamp;T operators revealed clear differences that steer a business towards success or failure. The majority of operators still dispose fecal sludge in an unsafe manner, due to the lack of official disposal or treatment sites. In comparison to sewer networks, the capital and operating costs (per capita) of FSTPs were significantly lower. The report provides evidence-based discussions on policies and recommendations for scaling and sustaining FSM.
Case studies / Households / Composting / Biogas / Nutrients / Energy recovery / Taxes / Government procurement / Technology / Risk / Profitability / Benefits / Cost recovery / Operating costs / Investment / Pricing / Marketing / Funding / Financial viability / Nongovernmental organizations / Stakeholders / Public-private partnerships / Urban areas / Treatment plants / Transport / Waste disposal / Toilets / Septic tanks / Solid wastes / Sustainable Development Goals / Hygiene / Sanitation / Desludging / Waste treatment / Value chains / Business models / Waste management / Faecal sludge / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H050010
Report
Households / Urban areas / Land use / Cost benefit analysis / Marketing / Operating costs / Production costs / Cost recovery / Business models / Investment / Public-private partnerships / Maintenance / Technology / Sanitation / Septic tanks / Anaerobic treatment / Sludge dewatering / Waste disposal / Recycling / Sewerage / Waste collection / Waste management / Economic analysis / Logistics / Composting / Treatment plants / Solid wastes / Waste treatment / Faecal sludge / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H049802
Introducing co-composting to fecal sludge treatment plants in Benin and Burkina Faso: a logistical and financial assessment
Based on primary data from fecal sludge (FS) treatment plants in three West African urban regions (Ouagadougou in Burkina Faso, Greater Accra in Ghana, and Grand Nokou in Benin), FS collection and treatment patterns were analyzed to identify possible scenarios for resource recovery (RR) through FS co-composting. FS collection was analyzed for up to 7 years, in part per day, month and season, as well as FS characteristics to understand peak flows, FS qualities and related variations to plan for appropriate RR technology and capacities.
Overall, the FS volumes collected by vacuum trucks were not significantly affected by the calendar days, months or seasons. Commonly assumed increases during rainy months were, for example, only recorded in Ouagadougou. FS composition appeared highly variable with a pronounced difference in total solids between FS collected from households versus institutional sources, likely indicating that institutions are served more frequently.
The analyzed treatment plants appear to be exploited beyond their capacity. RR for reuse can turn sludge disposal from a cost into a source of revenue with co-benefits for farmers and the environment, thereby reducing the pressure on tipping fees. The probability of the added co-compost production being financially viable on its own was estimated for all the study sites, indicating an earliest breakeven point after 5 to 8 years.
Households / Urban areas / Land use / Cost benefit analysis / Marketing / Operating costs / Production costs / Cost recovery / Business models / Investment / Public-private partnerships / Maintenance / Technology / Sanitation / Septic tanks / Anaerobic treatment / Sludge dewatering / Waste disposal / Recycling / Sewerage / Waste collection / Waste management / Economic analysis / Logistics / Composting / Treatment plants / Solid wastes / Waste treatment / Faecal sludge / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H049802
Report
Product certification / Carbon / Nitrogen / Plant nutrition / Fertilizer application / Fertilizer technology / Environmental effects / Pathogens / Health hazards / Protective clothing / Safety at work / Maintenance / Equipment / Monitoring / Product quality / Pelleting / Enrichment / Decomposition / Aerobic treatment / Sludge dewatering / Feedstocks / Urban wastes / Liquid wastes / Solid wastes / Organic wastes / Best practices / Guidelines / Manuals / Training materials / Organic fertilizers / Composting / Faecal sludge / Waste treatment / Waste management / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H049476
Training manual for fecal sludge-based compost production and application
Over the last decade, the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) has explored the use of fecal sludge (FS) in combination with other organic waste sources to optimize FS treatment and composting for the production of a safe organic fertilizer, which can – depending on demand – be enriched with crop nutrients or pelletized for volume reduction, delayed decomposition or easier application. Based on IWMI’s experience, this training manual has been compiled for plant managers and trainers to help ensure that staff involved in FS treatment and production, and application of an FS-based co-compost adopt best practices in all processes involved. The manual can be adapted to local needs as required. It also includes information on compost registration and certification, as well as guidelines for co-compost application in the field.
Product certification / Carbon / Nitrogen / Plant nutrition / Fertilizer application / Fertilizer technology / Environmental effects / Pathogens / Health hazards / Protective clothing / Safety at work / Maintenance / Equipment / Monitoring / Product quality / Pelleting / Enrichment / Decomposition / Aerobic treatment / Sludge dewatering / Feedstocks / Urban wastes / Liquid wastes / Solid wastes / Organic wastes / Best practices / Guidelines / Manuals / Training materials / Organic fertilizers / Composting / Faecal sludge / Waste treatment / Waste management / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H049476
Report
Case studies / Markets / Business models / Public health / Social benefits / Legal aspects / Environmental effects / Costs / Economic value / Economic impact / Monitoring / Infrastructure / Energy conservation / Nutrients / Fertilizers / Organic wastes / Residues / Chitin / Biodiesel / Biofuels / Biomass / Feedstocks / Animal feeding / Lipid content / Harvesting / Yields / Pupae / Larvae / Breeding / Insect farming / Bioconversion / Life cycle / Hermetia illucens / Black soldier fly / Technology / Waste reduction / Waste treatment / Waste management / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H049395
Global experiences on waste processing with black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens): from technology to business
Black soldier fly colonies can produce about 100 times more protein per year than chicken or soybeans, not to mention cattle, on the same area of land. The flies can directly feed on different types of organic wastes, leapfrogging closed loop processes within a circular food economy. Also, where no protein is needed, for example, to feed fish or pigs, the larvae can be processed into high-quality biodiesel. However, can this be done at scale? The answer is ‘Yes’. The report showcases some of the leading global businesses in Black Soldier Fly production.
Case studies / Markets / Business models / Public health / Social benefits / Legal aspects / Environmental effects / Costs / Economic value / Economic impact / Monitoring / Infrastructure / Energy conservation / Nutrients / Fertilizers / Organic wastes / Residues / Chitin / Biodiesel / Biofuels / Biomass / Feedstocks / Animal feeding / Lipid content / Harvesting / Yields / Pupae / Larvae / Breeding / Insect farming / Bioconversion / Life cycle / Hermetia illucens / Black soldier fly / Technology / Waste reduction / Waste treatment / Waste management / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H049395
Report
European Union / Governmental organizations / Institutions / Stakeholders / Households / Urban areas / Land use / Occupational hazards / Environmental protection / Fuels / Energy generation / Composting / Organic fertilizers / Sewage sludge / Soil conditioners / Microplastics / Heavy metals / Pollutants / Aquaculture / Pathogens / Excreta / Public health / Operating costs / Transport / Septic tanks / Pit latrines / Waste treatment / Waste disposal / Technology / Frameworks / Sustainable Development Goals / Policies / Standards / Regulations / Guidelines / Sanitation / Faecal sludge / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H049291
Guidelines and regulations for fecal sludge management from on-site sanitation facilities
In low- and middle-income countries, the management of fecal sludge from on-site sanitation systems has received little attention over many decades, resulting in insufficient or missing regulations to guide investments and management options. To address this gap, this report examines existing and emerging guidelines and regulations for fecal sludge management (FSM) along the sanitation service chain (user interface, containment, emptying, transport, treatment, valorization, reuse or disposal). It also draws empirical examples from guidelines across the globe to support policy-makers, planners, and sanitation and health officers, as well as consultants in low- and middle-income countries in the development and design of local and national FSM guidelines and regulations.
European Union / Governmental organizations / Institutions / Stakeholders / Households / Urban areas / Land use / Occupational hazards / Environmental protection / Fuels / Energy generation / Composting / Organic fertilizers / Sewage sludge / Soil conditioners / Microplastics / Heavy metals / Pollutants / Aquaculture / Pathogens / Excreta / Public health / Operating costs / Transport / Septic tanks / Pit latrines / Waste treatment / Waste disposal / Technology / Frameworks / Sustainable Development Goals / Policies / Standards / Regulations / Guidelines / Sanitation / Faecal sludge / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H049291
Report
Case studies / Research and development / Community involvement / Gasifiers / Biodigesters / Farmers organizations / Living standards / Empowerment / Investment / Biomass / Biochar / Biogas / Economic impact / Health hazards / Production factors / Supply chain / Refugees / Households / Urban areas / Sanitation / Marketing / Business enterprises / Briquettes / Fuels / Excreta / Human wastes / Waste management / Heating / Cooking / Renewable energy / Energy resources / Energy demand / Energy generation / Poverty / Equity / Role of women / Gender / Bioenergy / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H048999
Recovering bioenergy in Sub-Saharan Africa: gender dimensions, lessons and challenges
There is a strong link between gender and energy in view of food preparation and the acquisition of fuel, especially in rural areas. This is demonstrated in a range of case studies from East and West Africa, where biochar, human waste and other waste resources have been used to produce briquettes or biogas as additional high-quality fuel sources. The synthesis of the cases concludes that resource recovery and reuse for energy offers an alternative to conventional centralized grid projects which, while attractive to investors and large-scale enterprises, do not necessarily provide job opportunities for marginalized communities. Reusing locally available waste materials for energy production and as soil ameliorant (in the case of biochar) in small enterprises allows women and youth who lack business capital to begin modest, locally viable businesses. The case studies offer concrete examples of small-scale solutions to energy poverty that can make a significant difference to the lives of women and their communities.
Case studies / Research and development / Community involvement / Gasifiers / Biodigesters / Farmers organizations / Living standards / Empowerment / Investment / Biomass / Biochar / Biogas / Economic impact / Health hazards / Production factors / Supply chain / Refugees / Households / Urban areas / Sanitation / Marketing / Business enterprises / Briquettes / Fuels / Excreta / Human wastes / Waste management / Heating / Cooking / Renewable energy / Energy resources / Energy demand / Energy generation / Poverty / Equity / Role of women / Gender / Bioenergy / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H048999
Report
Case studies / Nutrients / Urban areas / Living standards / Social aspects / Fortification / Developing countries / Rural communities / Anaerobic digesters / Composting / Biogas / Energy generation / Groundwater management / Equity / Ecosystem services / Farming systems / Decision analysis / Decision making / Faecal sludge / Waste management / Waste disposal / Food wastes / Solid wastes / Municipal wastes / Organic wastes / Industrial wastes / Agricultural wastes / Agroindustrial sector / Wastewater treatment / Cost benefit analysis / Economic growth / Economic value / Environmental impact assessment / Socioeconomic environment / Water reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H049081
Assessing the value of resource recovery and reuse: social, environmental and economic costs and benefits for value creation and human well-being
To understand the full value of Resource Recovery and Reuse (RRR), a systematic assessment approach that balances complexity with practicality is required. This report highlights the methods available for quantifying and valuing social, environmental and economic costs and benefits of RRR, focusing on Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) as the primary framework. Rather than prescribing a standardized technique for conducting CBA for RRR, this report presents broad frameworks and several examples that can be catered to individual contexts. This results in a suggested eight-step process accompanied with suggested assessment techniques which have to be tailored to the type of question the assessment is meant to answer and related system boundaries.
Case studies / Nutrients / Urban areas / Living standards / Social aspects / Fortification / Developing countries / Rural communities / Anaerobic digesters / Composting / Biogas / Energy generation / Groundwater management / Equity / Ecosystem services / Farming systems / Decision analysis / Decision making / Faecal sludge / Waste management / Waste disposal / Food wastes / Solid wastes / Municipal wastes / Organic wastes / Industrial wastes / Agricultural wastes / Agroindustrial sector / Wastewater treatment / Cost benefit analysis / Economic growth / Economic value / Environmental impact assessment / Socioeconomic environment / Water reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H049081
Report
Partnerships / Incentives / Farmers’ attitudes / Composting / Agricultural production / Businesses / Sanitation / Cost recovery / Economic analysis / Economic development / Pelleting / Agricultural wastes / Solid wastes / Liquid fertilizers / Nutrients / Soil fertility / Waste management / Fertilizer application / Excreta / Assessment / Market prices / Market economies / Developing countries / Organic fertilizers / Faecal sludge / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H049028
Market adoption and diffusion of fecal sludge-based fertilizer in developing countries: crosscountry analyses
The safe recovery of nutrients from our waste streams allows us to address the challenges of waste management and soil nutrient depletion conjointly. Commercialization of waste-based organic fertilizers such as FortiferTM (fecal sludge-based co-compost) has the potential to generate significant benefits for developing economies via cost recovery for the sanitation sector and the provision of an alternative agricultural input for smallholder farmers. To guide future FortiferTM businesses, this report presents examples of detailed market assessments, based on farmers’ perceptions, attitudes and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a pelletized and non-pelletized FortiferTM co-compost. The research was conducted in the Greater Accra and Western regions in Ghana, and in and around Kampala (Uganda), Bangalore (India), Hanoi (Vietnam), and Kurunegala (Sri Lanka). Cross-country analyses helped to understand the effects of market drivers and, where possible, capture lessons learned for knowledge sharing.
Partnerships / Incentives / Farmers’ attitudes / Composting / Agricultural production / Businesses / Sanitation / Cost recovery / Economic analysis / Economic development / Pelleting / Agricultural wastes / Solid wastes / Liquid fertilizers / Nutrients / Soil fertility / Waste management / Fertilizer application / Excreta / Assessment / Market prices / Market economies / Developing countries / Organic fertilizers / Faecal sludge / Reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H049028
Report
Energy recovery / Communities / Equity / Water management / Waste management / Environmental management / Cost benefit analysis / State intervention / Payment for ecosystem services / Carbon markets / Value chain / Partnerships / Public-private cooperation / Risk management / Agreements / Grants / Loans / Funding / Stakeholders / Regulations / Development policies / Developing countries / Credit policies / Market economies / Incentives / Investment / Cost recovery / Financing / Economic development / Water reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H049025
Financing resource recovery and reuse in developing and emerging economies: enabling environment, financing sources and cost recovery
Resource recovery and reuse (RRR) of domestic and agro-industrial waste has the potential to contribute to a number of financial, socioeconomic and environmental benefits. However, despite these benefits and an increasing political will, there remain significant barriers to build the required up-front capital which is discouraging private sector engagement. A systematic analysis and understanding of the enabling environment, public and private funding sources, risk-sharing mechanisms and pathways for cost recovery can help to identify opportunities to improve the viability of RRR solutions. This report looks at regulations and policies that remove disincentives for RRR, public and private funding sources for capital and operational costs, risk mitigation options through blending and structuring finance, and options for operational cost recovery.
Energy recovery / Communities / Equity / Water management / Waste management / Environmental management / Cost benefit analysis / State intervention / Payment for ecosystem services / Carbon markets / Value chain / Partnerships / Public-private cooperation / Risk management / Agreements / Grants / Loans / Funding / Stakeholders / Regulations / Development policies / Developing countries / Credit policies / Market economies / Incentives / Investment / Cost recovery / Financing / Economic development / Water reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H049025
Report
Stakeholders / Marketing policies / Institutions / Legal aspects / Risk analysis / Socioeconomic environment / Decision making / Feasibility studies / Health hazards / Public health / Environmental impact assessment / Cost recovery / Investment / Economic analysis / Developing countries / Private sector / Public sector / Subsidies / Sanitation / Waste treatment / Waste management / Indicators / Performance indexes / Models / Business management / Water reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H047601
Testing the implementation potential of resource recovery and reuse business models: from baseline surveys to feasibility studies and business plans
Stakeholders / Marketing policies / Institutions / Legal aspects / Risk analysis / Socioeconomic environment / Decision making / Feasibility studies / Health hazards / Public health / Environmental impact assessment / Cost recovery / Investment / Economic analysis / Developing countries / Private sector / Public sector / Subsidies / Sanitation / Waste treatment / Waste management / Indicators / Performance indexes / Models / Business management / Water reuse / Resource management / Resource recovery
Record No:H047601
Report
Rivers / Public health / Farmers / Wastewater / Waste management / Excreta / Sanitation / Electricity generation / Household wastes / Benefits / Emission / Methane / Greenhouse gases / Biogas / Gasification / Social impact / Briquettes / Transport / Residues / Agriculture / Fuelwood / Fuels / Economic analysis / Environmental impact assessment / Socioeconomic environment / Models / Business management / Energy generation / Water reuse / Resource recovery
Record No:H047671
Energy recovery from domestic and agro-waste streams in Uganda: a socioeconomic assessment
Recovering energy from waste offers dual benefits – a) improved waste management, and b) provision of reliable energy to households, institutions and commercial entities. In this report, we present a socioeconomic assessment of three energy business models (briquette manufacturing, on-site (public toilet) energy generation, and agro-waste electricity generation) based on feasibility studies carried out in the city of Kampala, Uganda. We assess the potential economic, environmental and social impacts of waste-to-energy business models taking into consideration a life cycle of emissions to provide decision makers with the overall costs and benefits of the models to society versus a business-as-usual scenario.
Rivers / Public health / Farmers / Wastewater / Waste management / Excreta / Sanitation / Electricity generation / Household wastes / Benefits / Emission / Methane / Greenhouse gases / Biogas / Gasification / Social impact / Briquettes / Transport / Residues / Agriculture / Fuelwood / Fuels / Economic analysis / Environmental impact assessment / Socioeconomic environment / Models / Business management / Energy generation / Water reuse / Resource recovery
Record No:H047671
Report
Farmers / Farm income / Energy consumption / Greenhouse gases / Fertilizers / Industrial uses / Nutrients / Agriculture / Cost recovery / Economic value / Pollution / Sanitation / Pumping / Groundwater irrigation / Water demand / Freshwater / Water supply / Water resources / Wastewater irrigation / Water supply / Water resources / Wastewater irrigation / Policy making / Urban development / Urban areas / Sewage / Recycling / Water reuse / Wastewater treatment
Record No:H047508
Recycling and reuse of treated wastewater in urban India: a proposed advisory and guidance document
Recycling and reuse of treated wastewater are an important part of the sanitation cycle and critical in an environment such as urban India with decreasing freshwater availability and increasing costs for delivering acceptable quality water, often from far distance. This report has been developed as a possible guidance document for the Indian government and gives substantial focus to the financial and economic benefits of wastewater recycling from the perspective of public spending. The report presents possible strategies for city and state planners and policymakers in view of the sanitation situation and the role of wastewater recycling in the larger cities in India (class I and II cities and towns with populations above 50,000), and focuses on recycling at the end of sewerage systems after treatment at sewage treatment plants.
Farmers / Farm income / Energy consumption / Greenhouse gases / Fertilizers / Industrial uses / Nutrients / Agriculture / Cost recovery / Economic value / Pollution / Sanitation / Pumping / Groundwater irrigation / Water demand / Freshwater / Water supply / Water resources / Wastewater irrigation / Water supply / Water resources / Wastewater irrigation / Policy making / Urban development / Urban areas / Sewage / Recycling / Water reuse / Wastewater treatment
Record No:H047508
Report
Economic aspects / Public health / Small scale systems / Production costs / Retail marketing / Marketing / Enterprises / Supply chain / Raw materials / Carbon / Chemicophysical properties / Youth / Men / Women / Gender / Developing countries / Emission / Pollution / Residues / Agricultural sector / Environmental impact / Biomass / Communities / Feedstocks / Energy generation / Energy resources / Cooking / Households / Domestic consumption / Renewable energy / Sewage sludge / Faecal sludge / Recycling / Organic wastes / Industrial wastes / Waste management / Solid wastes / Urban wastes / Fuelwood / Briquettes / Charcoal / Fuel consumption
Record No:H047991
A review on production, marketing and use of fuel briquettes
Where modern heating and cooking fuels for domestic, institutional, commercial and industrial use are not readily available, briquettes made from biomass residues could contribute to the sustainable supply of energy. This study reviews the briquette making process, looking at the entire value chain starting from the type and characteristics of feedstock used for briquette making to the potential market for briquettes in developing countries. It also analyzes the role that gender plays in briquette production. Depending on the raw materials used and technologies applied during production, fuel briquettes come in different qualities and dimensions, and thus require appropriate targeting of different market segments. Key drivers of success in briquette production and marketing include ensuring consistent supply of raw materials with good energy qualities, appropriate technologies, and consistency in the quality and supply of the briquettes. Creating strong partnerships with key stakeholders, such as the municipality, financiers and other actors within the briquette value chain, and enabling policy are important drivers for the success of briquette businesses.
Economic aspects / Public health / Small scale systems / Production costs / Retail marketing / Marketing / Enterprises / Supply chain / Raw materials / Carbon / Chemicophysical properties / Youth / Men / Women / Gender / Developing countries / Emission / Pollution / Residues / Agricultural sector / Environmental impact / Biomass / Communities / Feedstocks / Energy generation / Energy resources / Cooking / Households / Domestic consumption / Renewable energy / Sewage sludge / Faecal sludge / Recycling / Organic wastes / Industrial wastes / Waste management / Solid wastes / Urban wastes / Fuelwood / Briquettes / Charcoal / Fuel consumption
Record No:H047991
Report
Case studies / Incentives / Household / Landscape / Urban areas / Farmers / Taxes / Nutrients / Septic tanks / Transport / Regulations / Licences / Partnerships / Institutions / Private enterprises / Organic fertilizers / Biogas / Energy recovery / Cost recovery / Finance / Stakeholders / Defaecation / Latrines / Sanitation / Public health / Composts / Pollution / Solid wastes / Waste water treatment plants / Waste treatment / Sewerage / Dumping / Desludging / Waste disposal / Models / Business management / Recycling / Resource recovery / Resource management / Faecal sludge
Record No:H047826
Business models for fecal sludge management
On-site sanitation systems, such as septic tanks and pit latrines, are the predominant feature across rural and urban areas in most developing countries. However, their management is one of the most neglected sanitation challenges. While under the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the set-up of toilet systems received the most attention, business models for the sanitation service chain, including pit desludging, sludge transport, treatment and disposal or resource recovery, are only emerging. Based on the analysis of over 40 fecal sludge management (FSM) cases from Asia, Africa and Latin America, this report shows opportunities as well as bottlenecks that FSM is facing from an institutional and entrepreneurial perspective.
Case studies / Incentives / Household / Landscape / Urban areas / Farmers / Taxes / Nutrients / Septic tanks / Transport / Regulations / Licences / Partnerships / Institutions / Private enterprises / Organic fertilizers / Biogas / Energy recovery / Cost recovery / Finance / Stakeholders / Defaecation / Latrines / Sanitation / Public health / Composts / Pollution / Solid wastes / Waste water treatment plants / Waste treatment / Sewerage / Dumping / Desludging / Waste disposal / Models / Business management / Recycling / Resource recovery / Resource management / Faecal sludge
Record No:H047826
Report
Heavy metals / Livestock / Emission / Pathogens / Aeration / Microorganisms / pH / Temperature / Moisture content / Sanitation / Health hazards / Public health / Organic fertilizers / Organic wastes / Soil organic matter / Excreta / Farmyard manure / Developing countries / Waste management / Food wastes / Urban wastes / Urbanization / Sewage sludge / Faecal coliforms / Composting / Recycling / Solid wastes / Nutrients / Environmental effects / Resource recovery
Record No:H047536
Co-composting of solid waste and fecal sludge for nutrient and organic matter recovery
Biological treatment, composting, in particular, is a relatively simple, durable and inexpensive alternative for stabilizing and reducing biodegradable waste. Co-composting of different waste sources allows to enhance the compost nutrient value. In particular, integration of ‘biosolids’ from the sanitation sector as potential input material for co-composting would provide a solution for the much needed treatment of fecal sludge from on-site sanitation systems, and make use of its high nutrient content. This research paper elaborates in detail the main parameters that govern the co-composting process as well as factors that control the production of a safe and valuable quality compost. It further explains technological options to tailor the final product to crop and farmer needs.
Heavy metals / Livestock / Emission / Pathogens / Aeration / Microorganisms / pH / Temperature / Moisture content / Sanitation / Health hazards / Public health / Organic fertilizers / Organic wastes / Soil organic matter / Excreta / Farmyard manure / Developing countries / Waste management / Food wastes / Urban wastes / Urbanization / Sewage sludge / Faecal coliforms / Composting / Recycling / Solid wastes / Nutrients / Environmental effects / Resource recovery
Record No:H047536
Report
Case studies / Trees / Deltas / Irrigation / Greenhouses / Horticulture / Solar energy / Energy generation / Phosphogypsum / Magnesium / Soil properties / Freshwater / Recycling / Water reuse / Drainage water / Water productivity / Water resources / Aquaculture / Ecosystems / Crop production / Desalination / Soil salinity / Sodic soils / Saline water / Land degradation / Land resources
Record No:H046996
Potential business opportunities from saline water and salt-affected land resources
Case studies / Trees / Deltas / Irrigation / Greenhouses / Horticulture / Solar energy / Energy generation / Phosphogypsum / Magnesium / Soil properties / Freshwater / Recycling / Water reuse / Drainage water / Water productivity / Water resources / Aquaculture / Ecosystems / Crop production / Desalination / Soil salinity / Sodic soils / Saline water / Land degradation / Land resources
Record No:H046996
Report
Case studies / Sustainability / Aquifers / Farmers / Health hazards / Environmental effects / Water scarcity / Water quality / Wastewater irrigation / Wastewater treatment / Water reuse
Record No:H046593
Global experiences in water reuse
Case studies / Sustainability / Aquifers / Farmers / Health hazards / Environmental effects / Water scarcity / Water quality / Wastewater irrigation / Wastewater treatment / Water reuse
Record No:H046593
Report
Case studies / Wetlands / Sanitation / Nutrients / Dewatering / Composting / Filtration / Gravity flow / Water quality / Soil fertility / Organic wastes / Recycling / Resource management / Excreta / Waste treatment / Sewage sludge / Faecal coliforms
Record No:H046695
Technological options for safe resource recovery from fecal sludge
Case studies / Wetlands / Sanitation / Nutrients / Dewatering / Composting / Filtration / Gravity flow / Water quality / Soil fertility / Organic wastes / Recycling / Resource management / Excreta / Waste treatment / Sewage sludge / Faecal coliforms
Record No:H046695
Report
Moringa / Helminths / Sedimentation / Farmers / Health hazards / Wetlands / Wells / Ponds / Weirs / Filtration / Reservoirs / Contamination / Sewage sludge / Faecal coliforms / Irrigation water / Water storage / Water quality / Wastewater treatment / On-farm research
Record No:H046382
On-farm treatment options for wastewater, greywater and fecal sludge with special reference to West Africa
Moringa / Helminths / Sedimentation / Farmers / Health hazards / Wetlands / Wells / Ponds / Weirs / Filtration / Reservoirs / Contamination / Sewage sludge / Faecal coliforms / Irrigation water / Water storage / Water quality / Wastewater treatment / On-farm research
Record No:H046382